That could get confusing, and messy on the screen, but it would be damn handy.Ģ. hierarchical stacks, and being able to open a 'sub-stack' of a folder in a stack. I've thought about it a bit more, and there's only really 2 things that have a definite benefit missing:ġ.
XMENU ICON CHANGE GEAR HEART SOFTWARE
I am hoping for both issues to be fixed in a future software update. It's not so much about what Stacks could have been that is the problem, but what was taken away in the process. I think most people complaining about Stacks feels the same way. What I DO take issue with is that they took away the hierarchical dock folder feature, which is something I DID use every day. The only difference is that it is only enabled when you have a folder in the dock. As I said before, in their current implementation, "stack view" is just another way of viewing folder content, like Column View or Cover Flow. I don't really mind that Stacks are less than what was originally promised - I don't see myself using them that much anyway. Whether for marketing, aesthetics, or technical reasons, we can only speculate. Apple's shipping implementation of Stacks is less than what was previewed. Apple removed the ability to show folder contents from the dock.Ģ. Right, so there are two separate issues at heart here.ġ. It's like someone painted your car and said 'hey, in order to paint the car, I had to make it so the windscreen wipers don't work, you only have one gear and if you want to reverse you have to turn in a circle. It's not even debatable on that point, Stacks offers less functionality than plain old folders in the dock did in Tiger. It'd be bad enough if Stacks didn't offer anything of value new, but the worst part is it actually removes functionality that many of us used in Tiger, without replacing that functionality with something equal or better. This coming after the OS had already been delayed because of the iPhone (Apple's own justification), which seems to me has harmed Leopard quite a bit (and maybe it'll be worth it in the end, but that doesn't fix Stacks now). It's not like we are expecting something out of thin air, Apple previewed features that obviously worked in some form at some stage, and then they took them out and (IMHO.) left Stacks in, in its current, crippled form only because they felt silly removing it entirely after hyping it up already. What people do or don't expect from Microsoft and how much they charge for their OS is irrelevant here.
Or going to and leaving feedback on issues you have, that's a choice too.
Surely 'ranting' is a choice too (expressing an opinion is kind of the point of a forum anyway). Or maybe once all apps leave a stack, there could be a placeholder for the stack. I suppose that app would bounce back to where the stack originally was. But let's say you close an app that wasn't the last one to leave. Sure, the dock would fill up with open apps, but that way you know what's open at a glance.Īnd what would happen if you open all apps in a stack? Well the last app to leave the stack would stay put. And when you close the app, it bounces back into the stack? I think that would be a good way to do it.
Or it could even just bounce out and sit beside the stack. when you click an app in a stack to open it, it bounces out of the stack, and goes to the right side of the dock, as if you opened an app from the finder that isn't kept in the dock. If there's more than one, they could appear side by side, or something. maybe when you mouse over a stack, if there's an application open inside it, it would appear above the stack? Like how the name of an application appears above the icon when you mouse over. Our pride runs deep in these beautiful mountains we call Home.Yeah, I didn't think about how you'd know which app was open in an application stack.īut how about this. Owned and operated by local people you know and trust. To all of our Valued Customers We appreciate the opportunity to serve you, now, and into the future. We are very excited to a part of this wonderful communities. We cover Floyd County, Pike County, Letcher County (Jenkins and Fleming-Neon), Hurley, Pound and Wise County. Gearheart Communications offers several companies that offers services such as High Speed Fiber Internet with Speeds up to 750 meg, Home Automation Security Services, Elevate HDTV and so much more. Our future depends on keeping our customers happy and that's what we intend to do! We would love the opportunity to earn your business. We strive to keep our network top notch with the latest equipment that provides our customers with the be BEST Telecommunications service experience available. Gearheart Communications is your source for "all" of your communication needs.
0 kommentar(er)
